Alongside family, friends, food, and shelter, good health is perhaps the most important thing to us. So when we're considering health options, we want to consider the best ... and in a way we can afford. So in our pursuit of good health, why should we consider biophysics?

Let's consider for a moment that it's the dawn of the modern allopathic era and you have a choice between two doctors.

The first doctor doesn't know about anything in the body smaller than cells, and as a result has no basis for understanding the complex chemical interactions that drive the body's health from the bottom up. He has no idea, for instance, that certain chemical drugs can be used to stop pain, that others can reduce inflammation, that others can halt a fever, and so on. He is from an era when doctors simply mixed substances -- sometimes many toxic substances whose effects were then unknown -- and gave them to patients. If the patient recovered, the doctor was the hero. If the patient died, then he had been beyond saving.

The second doctor, however, is of a newer era and uses these new-fangled things called pharmaceutical drugs, which are based on an understanding of something called "chemistry." When he's able to rightly diagnose a condition, this doctor doesn't just take a craps shoot at what to give a patient. He at least has some rationale about his approach and can consistently eliminate pain, reduce inflammation, and so on (even though he's not addressing the underlying cause and there are frequent side effects and even death; but he's more effective than the first doctor). Keep in mind, this whole "chemistry" thing is a little "out there"; you've never seen atoms interacting with one another. Can you really believe in this kind of doctor?

But from today's perspective, which doctor would you prefer?

Now let's consider a similar situation today. You again have the choice between two health practitioners. One is a licensed doctor who prescribes chemical drugs because he believes that the entire body is driven by chemistry. He prescribes drugs that often alleviate or eliminate symptoms, but fail to address underlying causes of disease and have frequent side effects, sometimes death.

The other isn't a licensed doctor, and he doesn't diagnose or treat any form of chemical disease. Instead, he offers these new-fangled things called "Infoceuticals^®," which are based on this crazy idea called "biophysics." Chemical interactions are a given to you, but is there really a quantum information field that drives these chemical interactions? This practitioner uses an objective machine to measure quantum emissions in the body field, then provides Infoceuticals based on these readings. They (usually) don't seem to work in 15 minutes the way aspirin might, but often within a month, chronic conditions begin clearing up one by one. And although this approach sometimes produces short-term healing responses, there don't seem to be any long-term side effects and thus there is no need for a growing dependence on the Infoceuticals.

Which health practitioner would you prefer?

We like to think that the wise answer is "both," because sometimes even symptoms of disease can be life-threatening and short-term solutions are necessary. This is where Western medicine may be beneficial.

But while biophysics is currently a theoretical approach to health, clinical evidence is very convincing about its ability to correct disfunction in the body, affecting long-term health improvements and potentially reducing clients' dependence on pharmaceutical drugs or on health supplements that may not be doing them any good.

This is why we believe biophysics is a great solution for those who are looking at their health options and want to know not only what can really benefit their health, but what can be really cost-effective as well.